In the Bosnia Genocide case1 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) had to deal with the crime of genocide allegedly committed in 1995 by Serbia in respect of Bosnian Muslims. Leiden Journal of International Law 21.1 (2008): 65-94. Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia-Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia) Publisher: International Court of Justice (ICJ) Publication Date: 11 July 1996: Country: Bosnia and Herzegovina | Serbia: Topics : Crime prevention | Genocide: Type of Decision: I.C.J. Map of Yugoslavia Slobodan Milosevic. On 26 February 2007, however, in the Bosnian genocide case, the United Nations International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was no evidence linking Serbia under the rule of Milošević to genocide committed by Bosnian Serbs in the Bosnian War. On April 5, 1992, the government of Bosnia declared its independence from Yugoslavia. One of the more heinous examples of murder in the Bosnian Genocide was the case of the town of Srebrenica in eastern Bosnia. The Bosnia Genocide case dealt with several important matters of international law, apart from the issue of responsibility proper for genocide. Abstract. 17 Pages Posted: 14 Mar 2009 Last revised: 7 Jul 2009. The town, along with many others, was caught up in the fighting of the Bosnian War and the ethnic cleansing campaign being perpetrated by Serbian forces under the leadership of Slobodan Milošević. IWPR staff. See all articles by Anja Seibert-Fohr Anja Seibert-Fohr . Date Written: February 20, 2009. After Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence from Yugoslavia in April 1992, conflict erupted between Bosnian Serbs and the … To draw a distinction between the terms, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered a verdict in the Bosnian Genocide Case: It [i.e. THE DEVASTATING MASSACRE OF 100,000 BOSNIAN AND CROATIAN CIVILIANS. The ICJ Judgment in the Bosnian Genocide Case and Beyond: A Need to Reconceptualize? The Bosnia Genocide case dealt with several important matters of international law, apart from the issue of responsibility proper for genocide. The bosnian genocide. So far 47 people have been convicted and sentenced to more than seven hundred years in prison, plus four life sentences for genocide… Bosnian Genocide Case: | | | Bosnia and Herzegovina v Serbia and Montenegro | | ... World Heritage Encyclopedia, the aggregation of the largest online encyclopedias available, and the most definitive collection ever assembled. They were lucky to escape from the area before the genocide happened. See also Application for Revision of the Judgment of 11 July 1996 in the Case concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Yugoslavia), Preliminary Objections (Yugoslavia v. Bosnia and Herzegovina) News articles. The Court began by addressing issues of state succession in order to identify the proper respondent. The events in Srebrenica in 1995 included the killing of more than 8,000 Bosnian Muslims committed by units of the Army of the Republika Srpska (VRS), in the area protected by the UN. The Court began by addressing issues of state succession in order to identify the proper respondent. "The strange story of the Bosnian genocide case."
The Bosnian Genocide Human Rights: The equal and fair treatment of all human under all circumstances. Serbia and Montenegro on Trial for Genocide, TU No 441, Institute for War & Peace Reporting, 24 February 2006; Posner, Eric (poster), Article in the Boston Globe: Bosnia v. Serbia on the blog site on the University of Chicago law school 9 March 2006.